The link between MLPs and Freedom Checks

The term Freedom Checks has been in the mouth of many investors in recent months. There has been too much talk about it although not all of it has been healthy. Some people who have not researched what it is all about have been spreading the wrong information. As a result, there has been a debate about the legitimacy of this idea. Whether it is a scam or not is something that has been discussed in details. However, after all the discussion, the truth remains that Freedom Checks are legitimate and it only that the people who do not understand what it is all about are shouting the loudest.

Introducing MLPs

Those who question this idea are those who have never heard about Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs). These are businesses which make the Freedom Checks a reality. The main reason why most of us have never heard about MLPs is that we depend a lot on what brokers offer us. When an idea is not popular among brokers, we also tend to miss out. The fact is, there are businesses known as MLPs which operate in the United States but under slightly different regulation from normal companies.

MLPs Regulations

MLPs are companies mainly in the energy sector. These companies mainly deal with manufacturing, processing, storage, and transportation of natural resources. They are required by law to get 90 percent of their revenue from within the United States. This is where the difference between these businesses and the rest come in. MLPs have restriction while others do not.

There are about 575 MLPs in the United States. Some of them are vibrant and offer valuable investment opportunities. It is upon the investor to pick the company that offers the best opportunities. When picking the company to invest in, the same criteria that apply in the stock market applies. How much one reaps from the MLPs will depend on the company that one chooses.

The idea of Freedom Checks was created by Matt Badiali, an expert on natural resources. He is the author of the Real Wealth Strategist newsletter which is published under the Banyan Hill Publishing.

About Freedom Checks: kennedyaccounts.com/about-freedom-checks/

End Citizens United Seeks To Elevate Campaign Finance Reform

Despite the fact that single-issue campaigns sometimes seem like a relic of the past, End Citizens United is making a sustained effort to demonstrate that discussing campaign finance reform can change the balance of power in American politics.

Both sides have leveraged the abortion issue, for example. The right has activated voters and influenced politicians through the National Rifle Association. Meanwhile, liberal-minded organizations such as MoveOn.org gained steam in times of war by getting the left active and protesting.

In recent years, big elections seem to swing more based on personality-driven leadership than anything else. The presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and Donald Trump prove this point.

However, End Citizens United, a political action committee (PAC) based in Washington, DC, is gaining momentum as a force in election years by focusing on campaign finance reform. In the wake of a 2010 Supreme Court ruling that removed certain limits on corporate funding of electoral campaigns, the PAC was created to reflect a grassroots desire to reduce the influence of corporate interests on American politics.

Like End Citizens United on Facebook.

While End Citizens United seeks to be a lasting presence in the political landscape, the organization has an urgent focus for 2016. The PAC is seeking to shake things up in November by raising and spending $35 million on congressional races in a very targeted way.

The organization is targeting the defeat of 20 Republican incumbents on its “Big Money 20” list. The list includes lawmakers who End Citizens United’s president Tiffany Muller describes as “the worst of the worst.”

Muller, a former Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee operative who also served as chief of staff to two members of Congress, is leading the PAC to create excitement on the left by generating fear among officeholders on the right.

Not only does End Citizens United call out elected officials who have the tightest ties to corporate political funding, but it also endorses and provides grassroots funding to candidates who will lead the fight for campaign finance reform.

Recently, the PAC succeeded in securing Senator Kirsten Gillibrand’s pledge to reject any corporate funding of her campaign. The New York lawmaker is seen as a rising star in the Democratic Party, and thus her pledge could influence many others to also refuse corporate dollars. Meanwhile, Gillibrand’s stature as a possible presidential candidate expands her influence even more heading into the future.

End Citizens United does not, however, just put its support behind one or two flashy popular politicians. The PAC has endorsed dozens of Democratic incumbents and challengers who it thinks will help bring much needed campaign finance reform.